Nick Wright, a popular TV personality, has sparked an interesting debate about who’s the better point guard: Magic Johnson or Stephen Curry. While Wright acknowledges Magic’s impressive resume, he would choose Curry for his all-time starting five.
Magic Johnson’s achievements are undeniable. With five NBA titles, he led the “Showtime” Los Angeles Lakers to immense success in the 1980s. He won Finals MVP twice in his first three years and was top three in MVP voting for nine consecutive years. Wright believes Magic is the greatest point guard ever, but he would still pick Curry for his all-time team.
The reason for this seeming contradiction lies in Curry’s unique abilities. Wright argues that in a hypothetical team with Michael Jordan, LeBron James, Tim Duncan, and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Curry’s shooting skills would be invaluable. His size and defensive limitations wouldn’t matter, as LeBron could run the point and the frontcourt would provide ample support.
Curry’s impact on the game is undeniable. He’s averaging 29.9 points, 6.1 assists, and 4.1 rebounds, with 49% shooting and 42% from three. The arrival of Jimmy Butler has rejuvenated the Golden State Warriors, and Curry seems back to his old self.
Wright’s rationale is sound. Curry’s shooting ability would create space for Jordan and James to operate, and his presence would elevate the team’s offense. While Magic’s achievements are impressive, Wright believes Curry’s skills make him the better choice for his all-time starting five.
This debate highlights the complexities of evaluating player greatness. Magic’s resume is impressive, but Curry’s unique abilities and impact on the game make him a compelling choice. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preference and the specific context of the team.
Leave a Reply