The Miami Hurricanes’ exclusion from the College Football Playoff (CFP) has sparked widespread support from the national media, athletic administrators, and former players. Many believe that Miami was snubbed in favor of Alabama, which was ranked 11th in the CFP rankings.
The CFP committee chair, Warde Manuel, cited Alabama’s 3-1 record versus top 25 teams as a key factor in their ranking. However, many have pointed out that Alabama’s losses were significant, including a 21-point loss to Oklahoma. In contrast, Miami’s two losses were by a combined nine points.
Miami’s lack of a win over a team in the CFP top 25 was also cited as a reason for their exclusion. However, the team’s win over Louisville, which is ranked 13th in the ESPN Football Power Index, was notable.
The support for Miami has been widespread, with many media members and former players expressing their disappointment and frustration with the CFP committee’s decision. ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips also supported Miami, questioning the committee’s decision and citing the team’s strong resume.
The controversy surrounding Miami’s exclusion has sparked a larger debate about the CFP committee’s evaluation process and the criteria used to select teams for the playoff. Many have argued that the committee’s emphasis on strength of schedule and wins over top 25 teams can be flawed and biased towards teams from power conferences.
In conclusion, the support for Miami after their CFP snub has been widespread and vocal. While the CFP committee’s decision may have been based on a complex evaluation process, many believe that Miami was unfairly excluded from the playoff. The controversy surrounding the CFP committee’s decision has sparked a larger debate about the evaluation process and the criteria used to select teams for the playoff.
Leave a Reply